It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Co-worker: Gilgo murders suspect unnerved her by tracking her down on a cruise
Exclusive new details about the NYC architect accused of being the Long Island serial killer, his life and how he may have been hiding in plain sight for more than a...
Arguments
Whereas knowing the nature of reality, would explain the existence of matter.
At this moment in time the nature of reality, remains a magical mystery.
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
I like your response, good answer.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 18%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would take the Scientific Method over Atomism.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
If there is another species somewhere else in the Universe, with a completely different society and completely different brains, then it is very possible that they do not see the world as consisting of atoms; they might have a completely different model that still gives accurate practical predictions. For example, they could immediately jump at a superstring-like theory, bypassing the atomic science entirely. Or maybe their scientific progress went in a way that cannot be easily understood by our human brains. In any case, I do not think "fundamental" properties of the world exist on their own; they need a thinking observer to be categorized as such.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra